Brian Elsmore, COO of ECS Solar Energy Systems, stands between the grids of solar panels outside of his business. The panels supply solar energy to his building. (WUFT News/Danielle Veenstra)
Home / Environment / Floridians Will Vote On Solar Panel Amendment

Floridians Will Vote On Solar Panel Amendment

By

Floridians using solar panels may see extra charges in their electricity bills after the November 8 general election.

Amendment 1, the Florida Solar Energy Subsidies and Personal Solar Use Initiative, is up for vote.

If the amendment receives enough votes to pass, it will give people the right to own and lease their solar equipment. Meaning solar users can sell their solar energy to their neighbors.

However, the second part of the amendment gives state and local government the authority to lay charges on solar power, according to Tim McLendon, a staff attorney at the Center for Governmental Responsibility.

The amendment gives the government the ability to control solar equipment and the costs that utilities pay to support solar users access to the grid and back-up power.

Rachel Meek, the senior account representative at Gainesville Regional Utilities, said GRU takes a neutral stance on Amendment 1.

“It should have no effect on our net metering customers,” Meek said. “Everything will be the same going forward.”

According to the Solar Energy Industries Association, people generating solar power can use net metering or the feed in tariff as a way to control their electricity bills.

When people using solar power in their homes have too much electricity coming from their panels, the extra electricity goes back into the power grid. The utilities use this energy to provide other people with power. At the end of the year, utility companies pay solar users for that extra electricity that they put back into the grid – this is called net metering.

The feed in tariff agreement states that utility companies will buy all of the electricity that solar users produce. People who choose this option do not use any of the solar electricity they produce because it goes straight into the grid.

GRU has 240 people using net metering and 259 people using the feed in tariff. Between August 2015 and July 2016, GRU paid $5,890,963 to their solar feed in tariff clients, which averaged $490, 913 a month.

Brian Elsmore, co-owner of ECS Solar Energy systems, installs solar hot water and solar electric for Central Florida. He deals with the utility companies directly when trying to get his clients connected to the power grid.

“GRU makes me jump through all their hoops,” Elsmore said.

He said that he has to get permission from GRU to install solar panels. There have been times when Elsmore could not install solar panels on clients houses because GRU wouldn’t give him the permission to do so.

Gainesville’s Mayor Lauren Poe said the city is a national leader in solar energy and was the first to provide a feed in tariff.

He said he strongly supported Amendment 4, which was passed on Aug. 30 and dealt with tax exemptions for homes and businesses with solar power. But, he doesn’t support Amendment 1.

“It’s keeping their [the utilities] control over power, including the solar that the individual produces,” Mayor Poe said. “It benefits them, not the 17 million people in Florida.”

Supporters of Amendment 1 gathered a lot of money for its cause. Most of the $16 million came from utility companies like Florida Power and Light, Duke Energy and Tampa Electric Company.

Duke Energy’s spokeswoman Suzanne Grant said the company gave approximately $4 million.

She said Duke Energy is a strong supporter of solar power and believes in protecting the environment. Grant also said Duke wants to take a “balanced approach” to solar power so that it is fair to all customers.

“We know that we need a variety of sources to provide power 24/7,” Grant said. “We see solar as a growing part of that portfolio moving forward.”

While Duke Energy gave money to Amendment 1, the company did not give money to Amendment 4. Grant gave no reason as to why Duke backed one and not the other.

This story emerged from an audience question. Submit your curiosities to Find Out Florida.

About Danielle Veenstra

Danielle is a reporter for WUFT News and can be contacted by calling 352-392-6397 or emailing news@wuft.org.

Check Also

Gainesville Volunteers Work to Eradicate Invasive Plant

More than 900 volunteers across Gainesville helped clear up the invasive species Coral Ardisia during the Great Invader Raider Rally on Saturday.

  • BorisP

    So the utilities are funding Amendment 1 huh? I guess it will be a no vote for me then.

  • Bryan

    Only a fool would lease a solar system in today’s ultra low priced solar market. Solar leases, power purchase agreements and even solar leasing company loans are agreements are three of the most expensive ways to have solar on your roof. Simply add up the 20 years worth of escalating lease payments on a solar lease or or leasing company loan and compare it to the local or regional dealers and you’ll typically find that you’ll pay up to three times what it costs to purchase a system outright.

    Today a name brand grid tie solar system with American made solar panels can be purchased and installed for less than $1.90 per Watt after applying the 30% federal tax credit. That’s less than $9,025 for an average sized 4.75 kW system or less than $.07 cents per kWh with a 4 to 5 year return on investment in many parts of the country. The solar leasing companies are still quoting $0.12 cents to $0.16 cents per kilowatt hour.

    And good luck ever selling your home with a solar lease attached to it. After all, what homebuyer will want to buy a home and assume lease payments on used, outdated solar equipment and give up their chances of collecting a 30% tax credit when they can buy a different home and buy a brand new solar system and keep the 30% federal tax credit for thousands less than the the remaining solar lease payments ?

    Search the Internet for the term “solar lease scaring home buyers” and you’ll find many reports from homeowners and real estate professionals that are having great difficulties selling homes with solar leases and PPAs attached to them.