Home / Government and politics / Ordinance proposes city elections be held in fall, not spring

Ordinance proposes city elections be held in fall, not spring

By

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Voters will decide Tuesday whether to change the schedule of future Gainesville elections.

Tuesday’s municipal election ballot includes an ordinance that proposes the Gainesville city charter hold elections the fall of every other odd-numbered year.

Bob Woods, communications manager for Gainesville’s general government, said after much deliberation, the city commissioners decided this was an issue that should be placed on the ballot for voters to consider.

In addition to moving the mayor and city commission elections to the fall from the spring, the ordinance would also change the term limits.

The mayor and the city commissioner terms would be extended from three years to four years, Woods said.

In order to allow for municipal elections in odd numbered years, commissioners currently in office would end their terms early so voting can take place in odd-numbered years.

If voters pass the city charter, elections will move to the fall of odd years starting in 2013, with a regular election in October and a run-off in November.

Leila Milgrim wrote this story online.

About Ethan Magoc

Ethan is a journalist at WUFT News. He's a Pennsylvania native who found a home reporting Florida's stories. Reach him by emailing emagoc@wuft.org or calling 352-294-1525.

Check Also

Temporary Injunction For Mandatory Delay Law For Abortions Upheld

A Gainesville women's center was part of party that filed a suit against the state of Florida regarding a law that required a 24-hour wait period before a woman could get an abortion. Florida's Supreme Court found that the state would have to provide extra proof when defending any laws regarding privacy rights, while also suggesting the law was likely unconstitutional.