Florida AG Bondi Defends Decision To Take Trump Donation

By
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump walks in the rain with Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi as they arrive at a campaign rally in Tampa, Florida, in August. House Democrats are calling for a federal criminal investigation into an improper $25,000 donation Trump's charity made to a political group supporting Florida's attorney general after her office said it was weighing legal action against Trump University. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert, File)
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump walks in the rain with Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi as they arrive at a campaign rally in Tampa, Florida, in August. House Democrats are calling for a federal criminal investigation into an improper $25,000 donation Trump’s charity made to a political group supporting Florida’s attorney general after her office said it was weighing legal action against Trump University. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert, File)

TALLAHASSEE — Attorney General Pam Bondi is defending her decision to ask for and keep a $25,000 donation from Donald Trump that she received at the same time questions were arising about Trump University.

Bondi on Tuesday for the first time directly answered questions about the 2013 donation. She said she had no regrets with the decision to accept the money from Trump and again repeated that her office did nothing improper. Bondi also said it would have looked like a “bribe” if she had chosen to return the money once questions arose.

Bondi personally asked Trump for money and got a $25,000 check for her political organization three years ago. Emails from the same time period show that her office had been asked about a lawsuit filed by New York against Trump University.

About Associated Press

The Associated Press is a wire service to which WUFT News subscribes.

Check Also

Bill seeks big changes to Florida defamation laws

The proposed Florida House Bill 991, officially titled Defamation, False Light and Unauthorized Publication of Name or Likenesses, would make it easier to sue news outlets for defamation by lowering the requirement to prove actual malice.