Preserving History Or Protecting A Confederate Monument? Putnam County Workshop Draws Vocal Crowd

By

Putnam Board of County Commissioners workshops don’t usually have a line out the door. But on Tuesday afternoon, roughly 100 members of the public showed up for the last item on the agenda: a veteran’s memorial protection ordinance.

The ordinance would prohibit the relocation, removal, renaming, or any other disturbance to memorials of U.S. veterans and presidents.

The crowd waited nearly three hours before the commissioners brought the ordinance up for discussion, prompting accusations of “stalling!” from the crowd, a dozen of whom began to stand with their signs in protest as the commissioners discussed other agenda items.

Over two hours into the workshop, believing the commissioners were intentionally stalling to thin out the crowd before public comment, a dozen attendees began to stand in protest. (Katie Hyson/WUFT News)

When talk finally turned to the ordinance, discussion was brief.

Commissioner Jeff Rawls, who proposed the ordinance, began by referencing the Confederate monument on the courthouse lawn, which the commission had voted 4-1 to relocate the year prior. The commission subsequently placed conditions on its relocation that activists said were in bad faith and opted not to meet, and the monument was not moved.

“I was opposed to the decision that the board made,” Rawls said about the vote to move the monument. “I thought that the citizens should have the opportunity to vote on it collectively. But as a veteran of this county, I think that we owe it to the veterans of Putnam County to be able to put into effect this ordinance.”

Commissioners Paul Adamczyk and Larry Harvey noted the ordinance language wasn’t as broadly inclusive of all types of historical markers as the commission had previously discussed, and said they’d like it to be expanded, before opening the matter for public comment.

Supporters of the ordinance said they were glad to see moves being made to preserve history.

Roughly 100 members of the public showed up for the last item on Tuesday’s Putnam Board of County Commissioners workshop agenda: a veteran’s memorial protection ordinance. (Katie Hyson/WUFT News)

But opponents said the ordinance wasn’t about history broadly, but a way for the commission to walk back their previous vote to move the statue.

“To see the vote that happened a little under a year ago was very hopeful,” Rev. Tommy Rogers of Bethlehem Baptist Church in Palatka said. “It’s hard to know exactly what happened from that point to where we’re at now, where a bill is being forwarded that is speaking to issues side-handedly, where the primary issue is the statue.”

Adamczyk insisted it was not about the Confederate monument but a protection of all things considered commemorative.

Tevel Adams, cofounder of the Putnam Alliance for Equity and Justice, said those on both sides of the debate over the monument share something in common their desire for the commission to make a clear decision.

“It is contradictory to vote on moving the statue but yet pass an ordinance to leave it untouched,” Adams told the commission. “We have been at a standstill since 1924. And we are ready for a long and overdue change.”

Adams noted more Black community members in attendance than at prior workshops related to the monument, including two pastors of local Black churches.

The commission decided to redraft the ordinance to be more inclusive of other types of historical markers before they put it to a vote.

Click here to read the story of the yearlong battle over the Confederate monument on the Putnam County courthouse lawn.

About Katie Hyson

Katie Hyson is a Report for America Corps Member at WUFT News covering racial and rural inequities in East Gainesville and north central Florida. She can be reached by calling 352-392-6397 or emailing news@wuft.org. Click here to learn how you can support her reporting.

Check Also

Archer solar

In the wake of the Archer solar controversy, Alachua County commissioners vote to buffer future facilities

The commissioners met this week for a special meeting to discuss the county’s solar policies. The conversation quickly centered around the tree coverage and buffer of these facilities.