Mariah Span, 81, sits on her porch at 421 SE 12th St. reflecting on GRU rates over the years in East Gainesville. (Eman Elshahawy/WUFT News)
Home / Development / What The GRU Referendum Holds For The Fate Of East Gainesville Residents

What The GRU Referendum Holds For The Fate Of East Gainesville Residents


East Gainesville resident Mariah Span, 81, has lived at her home on SE 12th St. for a year and a half, but her frustrations with high utility rates in the area have lasted over 40 years.

“I’m so used to GRU being bad,” Span said. “I’ve been with GRU for years and years. I moved to [East] Gainesville in 1975, and I’ve seen them this high.” 

The GRU Authority referendum on the November ballot will allow Gainesville residents to vote on whether GRU’s governing authority should be transferred to an independent board appointed by the city commission. State Sen. Keith Perry, R-Gainesville, said the Gainesville city commission, which currently determines GRU rates, has consistently voted to raise rates despite residents’ concerns.

“Citizens are forced to pay financially, and the lower socio-economic communities are hit the hardest by this,” Perry said.

Span has struggled to pay because of the high rates.  

“It gets worse during certain times of the year,” she said. “When it’s winter time, they don’t care if you’re poor.”

GRU spokeswoman Kisha Ellis said there are payment plans available any time of the year for customers experiencing high utility bills.

Ellis said higher than average utility bills could be attributed to, but not limited to, “weather, age of home, efficiency of the home and/or appliances, the number of people, the size of home and the [consumption] habits of residents.”

Span has used GRU’s payment plan in the past, but now her family helps.

“I’ve never had the electricity go out in this house because my kids are grown now, and I’ll ask them for a few dollars to help me out,” she said.

But Span’s rates are going up again.

The city commissioners this summer voted 4-3  to approve a 2 percent rate increase that went into effect Oct. 1. The GRU Authority Referendum — if passed — would remove the commission’s ability to raise rates and give that right to the board that commissioners would appoint.

Gainesville Mayor Lauren Poe spoke in opposition to the referendum last month at City Hall.

“This is the most important vote people in Gainesville will take this year,” Poe said. “They will either choose to retain control over the utility, or they will choose to give it up. The only difference is that when you have a problem, you can call your elected officials — they’ll pick up the phone and they’ll help you. When it’s taken away from the city commission, we will no longer have that ability, we’ll no longer have the ability to make a change and [the referendum] will lead to the eventual selling off of the greatest asset.”

A Gainesville political consulting firm is spearheading the campaign against the referendum.

Fair Florida Political Action Committee, led by Bryan Eastman, co-owner of Everblue Communications, said Perry put out ads claiming the city is using millions of dollars to build an ice skating rink in Gainesville. 

“This is one of the most aggressive, unethical attacks on local government that I’ve seen,” Eastman said. “He says the city is using the budget for frivolous spending when actually, when we pay our bills the profit goes back into our community.

Perry said he placed an ad that was a “little controversial,” calling the transfer of GRU revenue to the city budget a “slush fund.”

“The reason I referred to it as a slush fund is because they have pet projects of things that are beyond what anybody would call the core responsibility of city government,” Perry said.

At a city commission meeting held July 19, Commissioner Harvey Ward said, “This idea that there’s a piggy bank over here that we’re just stealing from is frankly not the correct characterization.”

Darin Cook, CEO of Infinite Energy and former Chair of the Utility Advisory Board, said at a public debate held last month that utility rates are likely to go down if the referendum passes and grants sole control to an independent board because a nine-member board of appointed energy experts would decide on utility rates, not politicians. 

GRU board member and UF Law Professor Joe Little argued that the ballot language itself is flawed.

“The ballot language that the voters will see is misleading and deceptive,” Little said. “Voters should not be required to vote on this.”

According to Little, there is no statute in the referendum that requires the utility authority to transfer any additional funds they receive to the city, but grants the authority the ability to reduce the transfer of funds to the city by 3 percent.

While politicians and city stakeholders spar over rising utility rates and government bureaucracy, GRU customers saw a 2 percent increase in rates October 1. This is the second rate increase in as many years, even though rates were reduced after the purchase of GREC, which is now the Deerhaven Renewable Generating Station. 

As for Span and other residents of East Gainesville, the fate of who will determine their utility prices will be decided in November during the General Election.

“I’ve been thinking about which way I’m going to vote [for the referendum] this election, and I still don’t know,” Span said.

The question for area voters: Do they want to retain the right to directly vote out an elected official who votes to raise their utility rates?

Read more of WUFT’s coverage of campaign 2018.

About Eman Elshahawy

Check Also

Standing On Dignity

In Its Endeavor To End Homelessness, Gainesville Begins Dismantling An Encampment That Had Become A ‘Broken Piece’ In A System Of Care.


  1. Reported statement by Mayor Lauren Poe: “…when you have a problem you can call your elected officials — they’ll pick up the phone and they’ll help you.” What does this mean? GRU responds to roughly 500,000 customer contacts a year. The city commissioners can’t conceivably handle all of those. But city commissioners can call the general manager–who responds to them quickly because they can fire him–and moves their friends and donors to the front of the line. That’s a way for commissioners to keep constituent and donor loyalty, but also unfair breaking in line, favoritism.
    The mayor also says that voting for an independent authority would ultimately lead to selling GRU. That could not be done without a vote of the citizens of Gainesville and he provides no evidence that it would be done. How does it follow? Moreover, the City Commission would appoint all five members of the authority. Why does he think they would appoint members who would sell GRU even if they could? Why does he think the Commissioners would appoint people who would lower the transfer to the city?
    What the bill does is allow the commissioners to appoint members to an independent authority who know more about running a business than they do, if they so desire. In the 50 states there are 68 municipally owned utilities generating a million or more megawatt hours a year. Of these 34 are run by independent authorities. Those 34 charge prices that average 13% lower than those run directly by city commissions. Partly that’s because they’re in lower-cost states. But controlling for that, their prices are still 6% lower, because they’re run more efficiently. For GRU that would be a difference of $17 million a year.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *