A civil lawsuit was filed Monday against Alachua County Sheriff Sadie Darnell based on previous disagreements about the sheriff’s annual budget.
In a meeting in December, county attorney Michele Lieberman proposed the lawsuit, and Darnell spoke against it, saying that the county is “chasing a false premise.”
But the county proceeded with the lawsuit, saying that they cannot come to an agreement with Darnell about the budget and the spending of the money.
“Because the County Commission and the sheriff are unable to agree, the county is seeking judicial opinions on three items,” Mark Sexton, an Alachua County spokesman, wrote in an email.
Sexton said the three items are:
- Whether the sheriff can move money between certain budgetary categories without going through the same process as the commission and other constitutional officers.
- Whether the commission can require the sheriff to separately account for expenditures from the Municipal Services Taxing Unit (MSTU) Law Enforcement.
- Does the sheriff have to code expenditures to specify if they were spent in incorporated or unincorporated areas.
There are two ways that the sheriff’s office is funded: through general property taxes that all people in the county pay, and from the MSTU, which is paid only by people who reside in unincorporated areas of the county for urban services.
The commission thinks that Darnell needs to account for how money is spent so that they can make sure that it’s going to all the right places and not to things outside what was originally intended, Sexton said.
Darnell is aware of the lawsuit but is not commenting until all of the paperwork is sorted out, said Art Forgey, an Alachua County Sheriff’s Office spokesman.
Commission Vice Chair Lee Pinkoson said that the lawsuit is an attempt to gain understanding about what is expected of the sheriff’s budget process. This has been an on-going battle, he added, and what’s needed is “someone to come in and say, ‘This is the interpretation.'”
Commissioners want clear interpretation of the state statutes that they must follow in terms of handling the sheriff’s budget so that “the sheriff knows what the expectations are depending on what the interpretation is,” Pinkoson said. “It could be that the county has to change the way it’s been doing, or look at it a different way.”
Pinkoson said a lawsuit was filed in search of an answer.
“It’s just how the money is handled,” he said, “so that as we get forward in the budgeting process, there is clear expectation one way or another.”