Home / Development / Hawthorne Residents Want Plum Creek Development To Protect Area’s Wetlands

Hawthorne Residents Want Plum Creek Development To Protect Area’s Wetlands

By
City of Hawthorne residents and government officials discussing concerns about the Plum Creek annexation at a city hall workshop meeting Tuesday night. (Gemima Rosier/WUFT News)

Their city accepted a big development opportunity from Plum Creek Timber Company.

That’s fine, Hawthorne residents said in a city hall meeting Tuesday night, but they want to make sure homeowners and the environment are taken into consideration during that development.

In December, the Alachua County Commission opted not to open a legal challenge against Hawthorne’s annexation of Plum Creek’s lands. The compromise was a workshop meeting at city hall. About 30 people attended Tuesday, including the city commission, Mayor Matthew Surrency and Plum Creek representative Tim Jackson.

Chris Dougherty, a city planning consultant, mediated the gathering. County commission chair Robert Hutchinson wrote a letter to the city requesting the city and Plum Creek address wetland protection, designate conservation areas and specify buffers in between developing areas and wetlands.

0Images displayed wetland zones designated for conservation and protection. Not every resident believes the city’s promise to protect these areas.

“There’s no preservation involved in any of this — period,” Katy Davis, 48, said. “There’s a difference between conservation and preservation and restoration, and most people don’t realize it. Conservation only means that they keep doing what they are doing with the land which is grow modified pine trees. They’re designed to not grow very big. They go straight into a biomass burner or they go straight into wood pellets.”

As an unemployed welder, Davis was not convinced that the landowner’s plans would be beneficial to the community.

“They haven’t deviated from certain treatments of communities in ways in which they promised jobs to people that really need them,” she said.

Hawthorne native Lori Wiggins, 54, said she was worried about her brother’s organic farm being contaminated if there are not sustainable buffers put in place to protect the farm. As a seller to local residents and business, the farm could be in danger of not being able to produce organic crops.

“They have invested their whole life and money into this,” Wiggins said. “It’s really, really important that you guys pay attention to that land.”

The city code requires a minimum buffer of 35 feet on the wetlands to maintain natural functions. The commission compared wetland regulations in neighboring areas including Gainesville, which has a requirement of an average 50-foot-buffer and a minimum required 35-foot-buffer.

Surrency said Hawthorne could mimic Gainesville by adding a 50-foot buffer average. That would increase the buffer between development and wetlands in certain areas.

Commissioner Tommie Howard said he agreed with adding the 50-foot buffer.

Jackson provided an explanation of the land use plan. The plan included protection of wetland systems, residential additions and improved road connections. He said road connections could impact wetlands.

Michael Dennis, a wetland biologist, was available to answer questions on plans to conserve and preserve the land. When asked how successful his plans were in the past, the biologist said he “had been doing this for 35 years.”

He said there are opportunities to preserve some wetlands and restore some in designated zones. Plans also include ways to accommodate wildlife now living in the wetlands.

What’s next?

Plum Creek will take Tuesday night’s recommendations, revise the plan, submit it next month to the city’s planning and zoning board, who will then decide if the wetland buffers and other modifications are adequate.

 

 

It could be three months before the full plan goes before city commission. Hawthorne city manager Ellen Vause estimated Plum Creek’s total compensation to the city for staff time and materials on this annexation project at upwards of $10,000.

 

About Gemima Rosier

Gemima is a reporter who can be contacted by calling 352-392-6397 or emailing news@wuft.org.

Check Also

$6 Million Expansion For Gene Therapy Facility Completed At Alachua’s Progress Park

Local and state officials gathered Friday in Alachua to commemorate a $6 million expansion at Progress Park.

One comment

  1. Michael Dennis provided vague and highly disputable information about the success of mitigation as a means to redress the destruction of wetlands during development. Overall, neither Mayor Surrency nor the various agents representing Plum Creek demonstrated interest in citizen concerns about aquifer protection–as evidenced by their yawns and flippant responses–nor did they provide concrete information indicating a serious commitment to protecting wetlands and wildlife and preventing overdrawing from the aquifer.

    To date, Plum Creek has not done environmental impact nor hydrological studies to determine the environmental effects of all of their planned development on the annexation area and the lakes region surrounding it. Instead, Jackson and Dennis said they would take all of these issues “into consideration,” which doesn’t really mean anything. Surrency’s, Jackson’s, and Dennis’s use of vague and placating language is intended to silence real discussion in the service of Plum Creek’s doing exactly what it needs to do to maximize its profits off of our region regardless of the environmental and human costs.

    Keep in mind, too, that the lawyer for the Alachua County Commission stated that she does not believe the current annexation plan meets current legal requirements. But who among us has the resources to sue the City of Hawthorne much less a mult-billion-dollar corporation?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *