Florida Senate committee approves budget
A Florida Senate panel is signing off on a nearly $70.8 billion budget.
The Senate Budget Committee approved the budget on Wednesday, even though some legislators criticized proposed cuts included in the spending plan.
The budget cuts $400 million from the state’s public universities, including substantial cuts to the University of South Florida and University of Central Florida.
Leading Senate Republicans defended the cuts, saying universities could absorb them because they have adequate reserves.
Some USF students showed up and spoke out against the proposed cuts saying their university had been singled out. Sen. J.D. Alexander, the Senate budget chief who has clashed with USF administration, insisted that wasn’t the case.
The House has already passed its proposed 2012 budget. Lawmakers have about three weeks to work out differences.
This entry was posted in Florida
. Bookmark the permalink
More Stories in Florida
Florida Gov. Rick Scott announced funding for the third and largest phase of early restoration projects to combat the Deepwater Horizon (BP) Oil Spill of 2010 on Oct. 7. Although $100 million was allocated to Florida by the Deepwater Horizon [...]
Now that the harvesting season is over, researchers are starting underwater studies to determine the state of scallop populations at 10 sites along the west coast of Florida.
The Florida Department of Corrections partnered with the Florida National Guard to hire veterans and military personnel who are unemployed. These specialty hiring events last all day and are open to all branches in the Florida National Guard and Reserves.
A panel of four met to discuss Amendment 2 and medical marijuana at a Tuesday night forum on the University of Florida Campus. Alachua County Sheriff Sadie Darnell and former Florida House Speaker John Mills dominated the forum as they debated each other about legislation language and the need for medical marijuana.
The Ocala City Council voted to repeal an ordinance banning saggy pants on city property. The controversial ordinance met with criticism from the NAACP.